AI Humanities: Reclaiming Artificial Intelligence

Logo of the Wheaton Institute for the Interdisciplinary Humanities (WIIH)

As Director of the Wheaton Institute for the Interdisciplinary Humanities (WIIH), I curate a programme to look at artificial intelligence from the perspective of the humanities. I want to revisit and reclaim AI as an endeavour of the humanities, deeply philosophical, artistic and creative, a project for the liberal arts.

  • How can we understand artificial intelligence as part of the liberal arts, and of the humanities in particular, and not just as another piece of technology?
  • How does AI affect the humanities and how should AI be shaped by the humanities?
  • What philosophy comes implicit or even explicit in AI? What philosophy can potentially be modelled with AI?
  • How can higher education, liberal arts education in particular, make use of AI? What are risks?
  • How does AI touch the life and experience of the students already now, and in the foreseeable future?

Reach out to me if you have suggestions or comments or ideas to participate:

Data is made of People

Keynote, ARD-ZDF Medienakademie, IRT, Berlin 17.6.2015

Auch wenn vom “Internet of Things” die Rede ist: Die meisten Daten stammen von Menschen. Zwei Milliarden Menschen nutzen Smartphones, aber auch immer mehr ehemals “dumme” Geräte werden mit dem Internet verbunden. Unsere Daten liefern ein immer vollständigeres Bild unseres Lebens. Aber die Informationen sind nicht objektiv. Es sind bestenfalls gut erzählte Geschichten, die wir aus den Rohdaten gewinnen. Daten sind dadurch ein wichtiger Rohstoff für Journalismus, für Werbung, für Sozialforschung, und sogar für Unterhaltung – kurz: Big Data ist ein Thema für Medien.

Social Media Week, Berlin – “When individual choice inhibits choice: Algorithm Ethics”

Session on value judgments in algorithms and software.

In many ways, our lives are dependent on implicit value judgements: Search engine results are returned based on what they consider are individually relevant. An algorithm in the ad-network’s targeting system selects which ads we see. Image processing – instagram as well as in MRI – forms pictures of our environment on our behalf. And as drones as prepared for autonomous kill decisions, this discussion becomes existential.

These ‘decisions’ come down to algorithms, and the “Value Judgements” attached to them interfere with our daily lives. We are however usually not aware of the judgements that are buried into our many devices.

This session gives in introduction into the three different forms of value judgements in algorithms, and will go beyond the obvious “calculable” value judgements – like credit scoring – and instead address the multitude of “hidden” ethic algorithms that far more pervasive.

These value judgements include:
1) Choosing a method
2) Setting of parameters
3) How to deal with uncertainty and misclassification.

All three judgements are mostly made implicitly, so for many applications, the only way to understand these presumptions is to “open the black box” – to HACK them.

Given all that, I would like to demand three points of action:

– to the developers: you have to keep as many options open as possible and give others a chance in changing the pre-sets (and customers: you must insist of this, when you order the programming of applications);

– to the educational systems: teach people to hack, to become curious about seeing behind things.

– to our legislative bodies: make hacking things legal. Don’t let copyright, DRM and the like being used against people who re-engineer things. Only what gets hacked, gets tested. Let us have sovereignty over the things we have to deal with, let us shape our surroundings according to our ethics.

Speech: Virtual Broadcast

Speech: “Der virtuelle Rundfunk”

For media as public there are minimum requirements>

Non-discriminatory access (all information is equally available for all users)
Net neutrality (every publisher has the same right of distribution of his content)
Plurality (of choice)
Societal influence (transparent representation of ethic and cultural values)

In Europe’s and especially federal German media tradition since WWII this becomes particularly visible with broadcasting law. Out of these rules of democratic-political media culture the large public service broadcasting institutions were shaped, that took an important position in the public life of the European Societies.

As the Internet does not just substitute broadcasting (to adopted the regulations more or less unchanged would then be an easy task), but lead far above this classic media concept by displacing classic media in their relevance, the influence of these media on our society fades away.

Therefore we need a discussion on ‘Virtual Broadcasting’, on public or public-law Internet.